Legal Opinion

Delagrange v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 18, 2011No. 49A02-1010-CR-1086PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*594OPINION

SHARPNACK, Senior Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Defendant-Appellant David Delagrange appeals the partial denial of his motion to dismiss. We affirm and remand.

ISSUE

Delagrange raises one issue, which we restate as: whether the trial court abused its discretion by denying in part Dela-grange’s motion to dismiss.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The parties stipulated to the following facts. On February 27, 2010, Delagrange went to a mall in Indianapolis. He had attached a camera to one of his shoes. The camera was connected to a digital recording device that stored the camera’s images. In…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Herron v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. State v. IsaacsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Ingram v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Stratton v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. State v. BilbreyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. David S. Delagrange v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Tiplick v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Jennifer L. Frink v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Kevin Moss v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Chaunsey L. Fox v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API