Delagrange v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*594OPINION
SHARPNACK, Senior Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Defendant-Appellant David Delagrange appeals the partial denial of his motion to dismiss. We affirm and remand.
ISSUE
Delagrange raises one issue, which we restate as: whether the trial court abused its discretion by denying in part Dela-grange’s motion to dismiss.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The parties stipulated to the following facts. On February 27, 2010, Delagrange went to a mall in Indianapolis. He had attached a camera to one of his shoes. The camera was connected to a digital recording device that stored the camera’s images. In…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Herron v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. IsaacsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Ingram v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Stratton v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. BilbreyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- David S. Delagrange v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
- Tiplick v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Jennifer L. Frink v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Kevin Moss v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Chaunsey L. Fox v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.