Legal Opinion

Ingram v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 2001No. 49A02-0105-CR-286PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHARPNACK, Chief Judge.

Frank Ingram brings an interlocutory appeal from the denial of his motion to dismiss. Ingram raises one issue which we revise and restate as whether the trial court abused its discretion by finding that the State rebutted the presumption of prejudice to Ingram resulting from the police videotaping and audiotaping private conversations between Ingram and his attorney. 1 We affirm and remand.

The evidence most favorable to the trial court's denial of the motion to dismiss follows. In early 2000, the Indianapolis Police Department's Internal Affairs Division began…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Joyner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Ajabu v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. QuattlebaumSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Delagrange v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Johnson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. John Larkin v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Willie L. Montgomery v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. State of Indiana v. Brian J. TaylorIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API