Legal Opinion

City of Lexington v. Chenault

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 29, 1913PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Fayette Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Chief Justice Hobson

Reversing.

Mrs. Sarah G. Chenault owns property in Lexington, Kentucky, on which she resides, fronting 178 feet on Limestone Street and running back to Upper Street. The ■lot was higher than the .street and a retaining wall had been built along the front of the lot to hold the earth. The-house set back 67 feet from the street and the front yard was set in trees, flowers and shrubbery. The city •of Lexington changed the grade of Limestone street, lowering it at the corners of Mrs. Chenault’® lot about •six or eight inches, and in the center of the lot,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Henderson v. WinsteadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
  2. Illinois Central R. R. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  3. City of Louisville v. KayeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State v. PahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. In Re Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  4. Morgan v. Hightower's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  5. Board of Councilmen v. BrammellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API