Legal Opinion

I. X. L. Lime Co. v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1904No. S.F. No. 3368PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPLICATION for Process to compel certification of the record on writ of review directed to the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County. Lucas P. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

On the verified petition of the plaintiffs, alleging that the superior court of Santa Cruz County had, in an action pending therein, wherein these plaintiffs were defendants and one Henry Steen was plaintiff, exceeded its jurisdiction, and that there was no appeal or plain, speedy, or adequate remedy, a writ of review was issued by this court, directed to the said superior court and the judge thereof, commanding them, within twenty days after service of the writ, to certify to this court a transcript of the record and proceedings in the action aforesaid, in order that the same might be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Derton v. BoydSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1860
  2. State ex rel. Cougill v. SachsWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Bannister v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1825
  4. People ex rel. Sutliff v. Board of Sup'rsNew York Supreme Court · 1892
  5. People ex rel. Dreicer v. OuderkirkNew York Supreme Court · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Dean v. CITY COURT, ETC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  2. Matter of De LuccaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Lee v. Small Claims Court of Judicial Township No. 4California Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Wisler v. California State Board of AccountancyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Goodrich v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API