Legal Opinion

Rolscreen Co. v. Abraham & Straus, Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided November 23, 1938No. 8406Published

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This is a motion made on behalf of the defendant to dismiss because of alleged facts occurring since the trial and decision of this case, which it is alleged, definitely establish that the plaintiff is not entitled to enforce.any rights granted to it under the Patents in suit.

On May 1, 1934, Patent No. 1,957,272 issued to the plaintiff. On May 28, 1935, plaintiff filed a Bill of Complaint against the Kirsch Company in the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Michigan, Southern Division, relying upon a related Patent No. 1,993,-173. On…

2Cases cited14 opinions

Altoona Publix Theatres, Inc. v. American Tri-Ergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
Triplett v. LowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
Ensten v. Simon, Ascher & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
Bassick Mfg. Co. v. Adams Grease Gun CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
Otis Elevator Co. v. Pacific Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.