Legal Opinion

Gage County v. George E. King Bridge Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1899No. 8975PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from the district court of Gage county. Tried below before Stull, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Harrison, O. J.

On August 1, 1894, the board of supervisors of Gage county allowed claims in favor of the George E. King Bridge Company in the aggregate the sum of $18,438.56, and in the month of August, 1895, allowed a claim of the same company to the amount of $4,854.45, and disallowed a claim of the company for $1,409.56. From the first mentioned allowance there Avas an appeal to the d istrict court by Julius A. 'Smith as a taxpayer of the county, *829and from tlie second there were separate appeals by Julius A. Smith, J. H. McDowell, and Daniel Freeman as taxpayers of the county. There was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stewart v. ButlerNew York Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Claflin v. American National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. PorterNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Worrall Grain Co. v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Fitch v. MartinNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Holt County v. TomlinsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1915
  5. O. M. Campbell Co. v. Boyd CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API