Legal Opinion
Claflin v. American National Bank
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided January 22, 1896No. 5884PublishedCited by 11 opinions
Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Keysor, J. A motion for a new trial is necessary to obtain a review of a case on error to the supreme court. (Harrington v. Latta, 23 Neb., 98; Yates v. Kinney, 25 Neb., 122; Miller v. Antelope County, 35 Neb , 237; Ecklund v. Willis, 42 Neb., 737.)
1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.
This suit was instituted before a justice of the peace by the American National Bank of Omaha, one of the defendants in error, against the Omaha Coffin Manufacturing Company, C. A. Claflin, and S. L. Andrews, to recover the sum of $150 and interest upon a promissory note, of which the following is a copy:
“$150. Omaha, Neb., July 13, 1891.
“Ninety day’s after date we promise to pay to the American National Bank, or order, one hundred and fifty yyy dollars, for value received, payable at Union National Bank, Omaha, Nebraska, with interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum from maturity until…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bohanan v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
- O'Donohue v. HendrixNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
- Polk v. CovellNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Newlove v. WoodwardNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
- Black v. WintersteinNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Slobodisky v. CurtisNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
- Weideman v. Estate of PetersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
- Bates v. PriceIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
- Anderson v. Union Stock Yards Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1909
- First National Bank of Sutton v. Sutton Mercantile Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1906
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.