Legal Opinion

People v. Fontaine

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 28, 1967No. Crim. 4651PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, P. J.

On this appeal, by our reversal in 1965 of the order granting defendant’s motion for a new trial, we affirmed defendant’s conviction for two counts of selling and furnishing marijuana in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11531. (237 Cal.App.2d 320 [46 Cal.Rptr. 855].)

In our decision we found no error excepting that which occurred when the district attorney commented in his argument on defendant’s failure to testify and the trial court instructed the jury regarding the legal effect of such failure to testify. We held that such error violated the privilege against self-incrimination…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. People v. TalleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. People v. BostickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fontaine v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. People v. AvilaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. People v. GarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API