Legal Opinion
Engel v. Bindel
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided April 27, 1965PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
The issue is: Can the impleaded defendants Deschaine be held liable to the defendants Antczak, for any liability the Antczaks may have to the plaintiff, under an implied contract to indemnify ?
It is conceded that there is not an express contract between the Antczaks and the Deschaines whereby the Deschaines agreed to indemnify the Antczaks for any liability the Antczaks might sustain arising by virtue of the work done by the Antczaks for the Deschaines.
The Antczaks disavow that their cross complaint against the Deschaines is based upon a joint tort-feasor relationship.
The contention of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Guse v. A. O. Smith Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Beck v. HamannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- A. O. Smith Corp. v. Associated Sales & Bag Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Hintz v. Darling Freight, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Huck v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mulder v. Acme-Cleveland Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Young v. Anaconda American Brass Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Algrem v. NowlanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Bagwell v. South Louisiana Electric Co-Op. Ass'nLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
- Hake v. Soo Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.