Legal Opinion

Huck v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1958PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWingert, J.

Summary judgment was properly denied. The present phase of this litigation turns on the construction of the following provision of the contract between Doughboy (the “Industry”) and the Omaha Railway:

“11. The Industry also agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Railway Company for loss, damage, or injury from any act or omission of the Industry, its employees, or agents, to the person or property of the parties hereto and their employees, and to the person or property of any other person or corporation, while on or about said track; and if any claim or liability other than from fire shall…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Young v. Anaconda American Brass Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Capital Investments, Inc. v. Whitehall Packing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. AdamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Sol Walker & Co. v. Seaboard Coast Line RR Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  5. Algrem v. NowlanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API