Legal Opinion
Miller v. Alagna
District Court, C.D. California
Decided July 18, 2000No. ED-CV99-0176RT (RZX)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS PAUL BUGAR’S AND DAN HO-TARD’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY CHRISTENSEN, MILLER, FINK, JACOBS, GLASER, WEIL & SHAPIRO AND THE CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE OF THE DEFENDANT CITY OF RIVERSIDE
TIMLIN, District Judge.
The Court, the Honorable Robert J. Timlin, has read and considered: 1) Defendants, Cross-Claimants, and Counter- Claimants Paul Bugar and Dan Hotard (“Bugar” and “Hotard”)’s motion for preliminary injunction and/or motion to disqualify Christensen, Miller, Fink, Jacobs, Glaser, Weil & Shapiro, LLP (“Christensen, Miller”) and the City Attorney’s Office of the City of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. EatonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- River West, Inc. v. NickelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Zador Corp. v. KwanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Earl Scheib, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Forrest v. BaezaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Antelope Valley Groundwater Cases Antelope Valley-east Kern Water Agency v. L. A. Cnty. Waterworks Dist. No. 40, Cross, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- HARRY A. v. DuncanDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2004
- Hana Bank v. South Pacific Petroleum CorporationDistrict Court, D. Guam · 2010