Legal Opinion

Wilkes Wirth v. Clark Equipment Company, a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 18, 1972No. 25293PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM P. GRAY, District Judge.

The plaintiff in this diversity action was a longshoreman on the waterfront at Portland, Oregon, whose duties required him to work as a part of a crew attending a thirty-ton motor driven wheeled vehicle, known as a van carrier, which ran over him, thereby inflicting severe injuries that included the loss of a leg. Defendant Clark Equipment Company had manufactured the van carrier and had sold it to Matson Navigation Company, in whose service it was being operated at the time of the accident.

The plaintiff sought recovery on the basis of two separate theories,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Price v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Pike v. Frank G. Hough Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Heaton v. Ford Motor Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Palmer v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  5. Blake v. Roy Webster OrchardsOregon Supreme Court · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bryant v. Technical Research Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. Donald Boyd Julander, and v. Ford Motor Company, a Corporation, AndCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
  3. John M. Hoppe v. Midwest Conveyor Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  4. Gilbert v. Stone City Const. Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Lenherr v. NRM Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API