People v. Thomas
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Solomon H. Katz, J.
The prosecution herein sought to admit into evidence, over the objection of defense counsel, portions of the minutes of a codefendant’s plea allocution, for the limited purpose of proving that defendant was aided by another person actually present, a necessary element of the crime of robbery in the second degree under subdivision 1 of section 160.10 of the Penal Law.
Whether a codefendant’s plea allocution is admissible as a declaration against interest is apparently a question of first impression in the New York State courts.
In this jurisdiction it is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- People v. MaerlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- People v. GeogheganNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. GeogheganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. ThomasNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. BrensicAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. Brensic, New York County Courts1983
- People v. BladesNew York Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. WashingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984