Legal Opinion

People v. Thomas

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 1986PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Kaye, J.

Statements contained in a plea allocution of a codefendant may, in limited circumstances, be received in evidence as a declaration against penal interest to establish an element of the crime charged against defendant.

After two chain-snatching incidents on 44th Street near Seventh Avenue in Manhattan, defendant and his codefendant (James Rucker) were indicted for robbery and attempted robbery in the second degree. One month later, while incarcerated and awaiting trial, Rucker agreed to plead guilty to *196attempted robbery in satisfaction of both charges and in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Lee v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. People v. SettlesNew York Court of Appeals · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. People v. SavinonNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. People v. BuieNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. People v. BrensicNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Halyalkar v. Board of RegentsNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Sidney Hawkins v. Joseph Costello, Superintendent, Mid State Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API