Landrum v. Severin
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
The appeal from a judgment in favor of Charlie M. Severin in an action for the recovery of damages assertedly sustained at the time of the collision, of two automobiles, principally concerns the applicability of section 531(a) of the Vehicle Code. That statute fixes a rule of conduct for a driver following another automobile. The car driven by George W. Landrum collided with the one operated by Severin, who was making a left turn in front of it. Landrum contends that it was prejudicial error .for the court, at the request of Severin, to instruct the jury in the terms of the statute.
The record…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smith v. RoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Lewis v. Western Truck LineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Rodriguez v. Savage Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
- Scott v. FlanaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Everts v. RosenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ulwelling v. Crown Coach Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- David v. HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Apodaca v. HaworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Oliver v. BoxleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Sepulveda v. IshimaruCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.