Legal Opinion
Apodaca v. Haworth
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 27, 1962No. Civ. 10123; Civ. 10124PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeek, P. J.
Lawrence Apodaca and Charles R. Joseph, both minors, were seriously injured as the result of a series of collisions between several vehicles. Each minor, by his guardian ad litem, instituted separate actions which were consolidated for trial. The defendants named in both actions were grouped as follows:
1. California Liquid Gas Corporation, as employer, and Oilfields Trucking Company, as owner of a tank truck and trailer operated by Floyd Claunch, Jr.
2. K/L Gas Company, employer of Rupert Frank Ballard, operator of a tank truck and trailer.
3. Ruttman & Alcorn, Inc., as owner of a refrigerator…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Finnegan v. Royal Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1950
- Gornstein v. PriverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Linde v. EmmickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Eramdjian v. Interstate Bakery Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Oakes v. McCarthy Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Haft v. Lone Palm HotelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Mathews v. MillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Betty Joe Bowman v. Redding & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.