Richards v. Halder
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This case came before the Supreme Court on March 9, 2004, pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not summarily be decided. After hearing the arguments of counsel and reviewing the memoranda of the parties, we are satisfied that cause has not been shown. Accordingly, we shall decide the appeal at this time.
The defendants, Yakub Haider (Haider), Salima Haider and Parvez Haider (defendants), appeal from a permanent injunction issued by a justice of the Superior Court restraining defendants from driving across or…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Associated Builders & Contractors of Rhode Island, Inc. v. Department of AdministrationSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
- PROVIDENCE RETIREMENT BD. v. City Council of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1995
- Waterman v. WatermanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1961
- Pucino v. UttleySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
- Board of Governors for Higher Education v. Infinity Construction Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- Grady v. Narragansett Electric Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
- Paul v. PaulSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
- Carpenter v. HanslinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
- Holden v. SalvadoreSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
- Plainfield Pike Development, LLC. v. Victor Anthony Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.