Legal Opinion

PROVIDENCE RETIREMENT BD. v. City Council of Providence

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided July 10, 1995No. 93-336-APublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LEDERBERG, Justice.

These consolidated cases came before the Supreme Court on the appeal of the defendants 1 from a judgment of the Superior Court that enjoined them from implementing an amendment to the Code of Ordinances of the City of Providence. It is the conclusion of this court that the authority of the Providence Retirement Board of the Employees’ Retirement System to invest pension funds was derived pursuant to a valid ordinance. We further conclude that the amendment that transferred the investment authority to the Board of Investment Commissioners was a permissible exercise of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Burns v. SundlunSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
  2. Betz v. PaolinoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
  3. Forte Bros., Inc. v. RONALD M. ASH & ASSOC., INC.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
  4. Reback v. Rhode Island Board of RegentsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989
  5. Fiore v. LynchSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Gorman v. St. Raphael AcademySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  2. Holden v. SalvadoreSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  3. Granoff Realty II Ltd. Partnership v. RossiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
  4. Board of Governors for Higher Education v. Infinity Construction Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
  5. Retirement Board of the Employees' Retirement System v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API