Legal Opinion
Salop v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 6, 1998PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Goodman, J., and a jury), entered August 14, 1996, inter alia, apportioning liability between third-party plaintiff electric utility and third-party defendant paving contractor 30% and 70%, respectively, and awarding plaintiff, inter alia, $230,000 and $490,000 for past and future pain and suffering, respectively, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Concerning the paving contractor’s negligence, the jury could have reasonably concluded that under its contract with the utility, it was responsible for inspecting the backfilling contractor’s work…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lanpont v. Savvas Cab Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Munoz v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Brito v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Koplewicz v. Colony Ticket Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by9 opinions
- Urbina v. 26 Court Street Associates, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Garcia v. Queens Surface Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Hoerner v. Chrysler Financial Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Myers v. S. Schaffer Grocery Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.