Legal Opinion

Munoz v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 18, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Car*146men Beauchamp Ciparick, J.), entered, on or about July 1, 1993, which denied third-party defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Unresolved questions concerning the specific surface and/or object which allegedly precipitated plaintiffs fall and injury, and whether third-party defendant could have caused or contributed to the alleged mishap, preclude a grant of summary judgment. That third-party defendant’s paving work was deemed satisfactory by an inspector nine months prior to the accident does not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sternbach v. Cornell UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Salop v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Murphy v. Omer Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Kearns v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API