Chesney v. Stevens
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CAVANAUGH, Judge:
This appeal requires us to decide whether a landlord is required to reimburse his tenant for the cost of improvements that the tenant unilaterally makes to the leased premises. The trial court ruled that appellant-landlord, John Stevens, was required to reimburse appellees-tenants, James and Cora Chesney, $11,790.00 for the improvements they made to the leased realty under a theory of unjust enrichment. After careful review and for the reasons which follow, we affirm.
In 1984, appellant-landlord and appellees-tenants entered into a month-to-month lease for a piece of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pugh v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Styer v. HugoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Meehan v. Cheltenham TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- McCormick v. Columbus Conveyer Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Styer v. HugoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- American & Foreign Insurance v. Jerry's Sport Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Schenck v. K.E. David, Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Drysdale v. WoerthDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Cambria-Stoltz Enterprises v. TNT InvestmentsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- West Philadelphia Therapy Center v. Erie Insurance GroupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.