Legal Opinion

Chesney v. Stevens

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 13, 1994No. 1274PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAUGH, Judge:

This appeal requires us to decide whether a landlord is required to reimburse his tenant for the cost of improvements that the tenant unilaterally makes to the leased premises. The trial court ruled that appellant-landlord, John Stevens, was required to reimburse appellees-tenants, James and Cora Chesney, $11,790.00 for the improvements they made to the leased realty under a theory of unjust enrichment. After careful review and for the reasons which follow, we affirm.

In 1984, appellant-landlord and appellees-tenants entered into a month-to-month lease for a piece of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pugh v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Styer v. HugoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Meehan v. Cheltenham TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. McCormick v. Columbus Conveyer Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Styer v. HugoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. American & Foreign Insurance v. Jerry's Sport Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Schenck v. K.E. David, Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Drysdale v. WoerthDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Cambria-Stoltz Enterprises v. TNT InvestmentsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. West Philadelphia Therapy Center v. Erie Insurance GroupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API