Legal Opinion

Waldo v. Cummings

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1867PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of Sangamon county; the Hon. Edward T. Bice, Judge, presiding. This was a bill in chancery originally filed in the Circuit Court of Tazewell county, by the plaintiffs in error, Caroline M. Waldo and Josiah C. Waldo, against the defendants in error, Sarah C. Cummings and Columbus B. Cummings, for a construction of the will of one David Mark.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Walker

This case involves the true construction of a portion of the last will and testament of David Mark, deceased. He devised to his wife one-third of his real estate, which was large, valuable and productive, to hold during her natural life, and to receive and to use the rents, issues and profits; also one-third of a large personal estate, to hold absolutely and in her own right. He also made provision for the maintenance and education of his children until they arrived at the age of twenty-one. He then devised all of the rest and residue of his estate, both real and personal, to James Boberts…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Executors of Moffat v. StrongNew York Supreme Court · 1813
  2. Rhoads v. RhoadsIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Prettyman v. WalstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. MenefeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Becker v. ChesterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Johnson v. PrestonIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Marsh v. ReedIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Hart v. SeymourIllinois Supreme Court · 1893

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API