Legal Opinion

Hart v. Seymour

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1893PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Kirk Hawes, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

This was a bill in chancery, brought by Manuel B. Hart and Love Mary Vaughan, grandchildren and only heirs at law of Mary A. Bishop, deceased, against Thomas H. Seymour and numerous other parties, to redeem certain lands from sale on execution in certain attachment proceedings prosecuted against Mary A. Bishop, in her lifetime. It appears that about July 20, 1871, Mrs. Bishop purchased of James E. Tyler, George Field and John F. Eberhardt, trustees of the Norwood Land and Building Association, block 62, in Norwood Park, and that to secure a part of the purchase money, she executed her three…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Everitt v. . EverittNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  2. Kirkland v. CoxIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Towar v. HaleNew York Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Waldo v. CummingsIllinois Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. People v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Schumann-Heink v. FolsomIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Goldwater v. OltmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Melvin v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  5. City of St. Albans v. AverySupreme Court of Vermont · 1921

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API