Legal Opinion

Executors of Moffat v. Strong

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1813PublishedCited by 45 opinions

THIS was an action of covenant, brought to recover 250 dolIars, with the interest) on a sealed note, executed by the defendantj to the testator, in his lifetime. The defendant pleaded the weneral jggue.

Read the full summary

THIS was an action of covenant, brought to recover 250 dolIars, with the interest) on a sealed note, executed by the defendantj to the testator, in his lifetime. The defendant pleaded the weneral jggue. The cause was tried at the Orcmge circuit, in Sep° e ® % ? 1 Umber, 1811, before the Chief Justice, and a verdict' was taken for the plaintiffs, by consent, subject to the opinion of the court, on the following case : Moffat, the testator, on the ] 2th October, 1807, made his last , , . ' will and testament, and appointed the plaintiffs his executors. The testator afterwards died, leaving five…

1Opinion of the Court

Kent, Ch. J.

delivered the opinion of the court. Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to recover, turns wholly upon the construction to be given to the clause in the will of the testator. After giving certain specific parts of his real and personal *14estate to each of his sons, and directing the remainder of his moveable estate to be divided among his heirs, the testator adds this provision: “ and if any of my sons aforesaid should die 1 7 J J without lawful issue, then let his or their part or parts be divided equally among the survivors, unless it should happen that he or they so dying should…

2Cited by45 opinions

  1. Howard v. CarusiSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Norris v. . BeyeaNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  3. Flinn v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1850
  4. Mason v. Pate'sSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  5. Hooper v. BradburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API