Legal Opinion

People v. Cleburn

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 20, 1989No. 88SA382PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lohr

The prosecution has filed this interlocutory appeal pursuant to C.A.R. 4.1 challenging an order of the Fremont County District Court suppressing a rifle and statements made by the defendant to a deputy sheriff. The trial court concluded that the statements had been made during a custodial interrogation without the required reading of Miranda1 warnings and were involuntary. The trial court also ruled that the rifle had been seized after a warrant-less search conducted without the voluntary consent of the defendant. We affirm the trial court’s ruling and remand the case for further proceedings.

I

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Orozco v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. People v. ThiretSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  5. People v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. People v. GenningsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. People v. BreidenbachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  3. People v. TrujilloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  4. People v. MinjarezSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  5. People v. LehmkuhlColorado Court of Appeals · 2004

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API