State Ex Rel. Burnquist v. Village of North Pole
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
Quo toarrcmto upon the relation of the attorney general to test the corporate existence of the village of North Pole. Upon issues duly framed, the trial court found the facts to be substantially as claimed by the state, and judgment was ordered declaring the “purported incorporation and organization of said Village” to be “wholly null, void, and of no effect,” and that “its purported officers” should be “ousted and excluded” from “acting and functioning in any manner as such.” From the judgment entered pursuant thereto, defendants appeal. We shall hereafter include…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Eberhart v. EberhartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Evens v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- State ex rel. Young v. Village of KentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- State ex rel. Hilton v. City of NashwaukSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- State ex rel. Probstfield v. SharpSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Danielson v. Village of MoundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Rice v. ConnollySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Sviggum v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Town of Burnsville v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Franzwa v. City of HackensackDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.