Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 11, 1964No. Crim. 9680PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFiles, J.

Defendant was charged with a violation of section 476a of the Penal Code in that he issued a $50 check without sufficient funds. The information does not allege that defendant had previously been convicted of any offense. At the commencement of the trial defendant withdrew his prior plea of not guilty and pleaded guilty as charged. The court accepted this plea and ordered a probation report. Although the probation report is not a part of the record on appeal, the remarks of the trial judge indicate that it disclosed that defendant had been convicted before of violat ing section 476a. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. IbarraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Flores v. ArroyoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. In Re Application of LunaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. People v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re McKinneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. People v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. People v. WinchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Winton v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. McIntyre v. DavidSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API