Legal Opinion
Burke v. Monumental Division No. 52, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided May 27, 1924No. 2177PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
We think the decree in this ease is right, and it is affirmed, on the following authorities: Otto v. Tailors’ B. & P. Union, 75 Cal. 308, 17 Pac. 217, 7 Am. St. Rep. 156 and note; Society, etc., v. Commonwealth, 52 Pa. 125, 91 Am. Dec. 139; Maxwell v. Theatrical Mech. Ass’n, 54 Misc. Rep. 619, 104 N. Y. Supp. 815; Dewar v. Minneapolis Lodge, No. 44, B. P. O. E., 155 Minn. 98, 192 N. W. 358; Del Ponte v. Societa Italiana, 27 R. I. 1, 60 Atl. 237, 70 L. R. A. 188, 114 Am. St. Rep. 17; 25 R. C. L. 55; 5 C. J. 1354. Affirmed.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Otto v. ProtectiveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Dewar v. Minneapolis Lodge No. 44 Benevolent & Protective Order of ElksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Society for Visitation of Sick v. Commonwealth ex rel. MeyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866
- Maxwell v. Theatrical Mechanical Ass'nAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1907
- Del Ponte v. Societa Italiana Di M. S. Guglielmo MarconiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1905
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hernandez v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926
- Snyder v. Grand International Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929