Legal Opinion

Moench v. Robertson

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 10, 1995No. 94-5637UnknownCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GREENBERG, Circuit Judge.

This case requires us to decide the following difficult question: To what extent may fiduciaries of Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs) be held liable under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) for investing solely in employer common stock, when both Congress and the terms of the ESOP provide that the primary purpose of the plan is to invest in the employer’s securities. The district court held that fiduciaries cannot be liable in such cases, and therefore it granted the fiduciaries’ motion for summary judgment. Because we…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Nachman Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Central Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Hozier v. Midwest Fasteners, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Moench v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. (PC) Murphy v. RudasDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  3. Brown v. SharpeDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2024
  4. Brown v. SharpeDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2024
  5. Browner v. BrownDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2023

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API