Legal Opinion
(PC) Murphy v. Rudas
District Court, E.D. California
Decided May 20, 2021No. 2:20-cv-00073Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MONRELL D. MURPHY, No. 2:20-cv-0073 TLN DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 RUDAS, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendant failed to provide adequate medical treatment in 19 violation of his Eighth Amendment rights. Presently before the court is defendant’s fully briefed 20 motion to compel. (ECF No. 35.) For the reasons set forth below, the court will grant the motion 21 and direct…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- William Hunt v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Avila v. Willits Environmental Remediation TrustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America v. Mark Torf, Torf Environmental Management, in Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Dennis D. Ellis, Intervenor-Appellant. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Dennis D. Ellis, Intervenor-Appellant. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Ponderosa Paint Manufacturing, Inc., Intervenor-Appellant. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Ponderosa Paint Manufacturing, Inc., Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- In Re Bankers Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Miller v. PancucciDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.