Legal Opinion

TRI-COUNTY FINANCE, INC. v. Miller

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1954PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCarrie, J.

Inasmuch as plaintiff’s conditional sales contract was duly filed in the office of register of deeds in the county in which Reuter had kept the hogs following his purchase of them, plaintiff had fully complied with the provisions of sec. 122.06, Stats., which require that the conditional sales contract, or copy thereof, be filed in the office of register of deeds in the county in which the goods are first kept for use by the buyer after the sale. Sec. 122.05 constitutes such filing to be constructive notice to all third persons who attempt to deal with the property described in such a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Geroy v. UpperOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Kellogg v. CostelloWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Met-Al, Inc. v. Hansen Storage Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API