Legal Opinion
Lippoth v. Zoning Bd. of App., City of So. Portland
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided November 13, 1973PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHIBALD, Justice.
Plaintiff is a resident owner of real estate in South Portland. Desiring to construct a garage on this property he applied to the South Portland Zoning Board of Appeals requesting a variance from the “set back” provisions of the Zoning Ordinance assigning the following reasons:
“To get cars off st. To allow emergency vehicles to pass and to alleviate park ing problems for the two houses beyond my property. A variance is requested for set back requirements.”
After due notice a hearing was held at which appellant Elzada M. Frost, an abutting land owner, appeared in opposition.
Th…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Moyer v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
- Dubiel v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Highland Park, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Keeney v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
- Planning Bd. of Springfield v. BD. OF SPRINGFIELDMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Driscoll v. GheewallaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Penobscot Area Housing Development Corp. v. City of BrewerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Your Home, Inc. v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Barnard v. Zoning Bd. of App. of Town of YarmouthSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
- Kay v. City of Rancho Palos VerdesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.