Legal Opinion

United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Elder

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 23, 1980No. 79-1575PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jiganti

The dispute in this lawsuit centers around the question of whether the automobile of Thomas C. Elder, the defendant-insured, was a replacement automobile or an additional automobile under the insurance policy issued by United Farm Bureau, the plaintiff-insurer. Under the terms of the policy, a replacement automobile would have coverage whereas an additional automobile would not have coverage. Also in issue is whether or not that determination is a question of law or fact. United filed a declaratory judgment action. Its motion for summary judgment was allowed.

Thomas Elder purchased a Ford…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nerone v. BoehlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  2. Schneider v. NeubertIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Nationwide Insurance v. ErvinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  4. Carl M. Loeb, Jr. v. Laurence Hammond and Kirkpatrick W. DillingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
  5. Ball v. BenjaminIllinois Supreme Court · 1870

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Countryman v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  2. United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. ElderIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. UIDC Management, Inc. v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  4. First National Bank of Oak Lawn v. MinkeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. In Re Estate of BajonskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API