Legal Opinion
Carl M. Loeb, Jr. v. Laurence Hammond and Kirkpatrick W. Dilling
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 25, 1969No. 16777PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERNER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff, Carl M. Loeb, Jr., filed suit charging defendants Hammond and Dilling with fraud and deceit and conspiracy to defraud and deceive the plaintiff. The District Court directed a verdict for defendant Dilling and the jury found in favor of defendant Hammond.
Loeb and Hammond both owned interests in Florida Manganese, Inc. Part of the assets of this corporation were two mines, Rediscovery I and II. Hammond also claimed ownership of these mines separate and apart from the corporation. In October of 1960, Loeb filed suit in the Northern District of Illinois, against…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hiltpold v. SternDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
- McBean v. FoxAppellate Court of Illinois · 1878
- Bliesener v. Baird & Warner, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1967
- Simon J. Carlson & Son, Inc. v. FrickeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Marx & Co. v. Diners' Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Lewis A. ZipkinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Tcp Industries, Inc. v. Uniroyal, Inc., Donald C. FresneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Christou v. Arlington Park-Washington Park Race Tracks Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Continental Casualty Company v. Ervin Howard, D/B/A Lafayette ComponentsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.