Legal Opinion
Graham County Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Local Union No. 287, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided July 12, 2005No. CV 04-527-TUC-CKJPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JORGENSON, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs (the “Cooperative”) Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendant’s (the “Union”) Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons stated below, the Cooperative’s motion is denied, and the Union’s motion is granted.
I. Standard of Review for a Motion for Summary Judgment
Summary judgment is appropriate where “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). A genuine issue exists if “the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party,” and material facts are those…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Poweragent Inc., a California Corporation v. Electronic Data Systems Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Inlandboatmens Union of the Pacific v. Dutra Group, Dba Dutra Construction Co. Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Hawaii Teamsters and Allied Workers Union, Local 996,petitioner-Appellant v. United Parcel ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.