Inlandboatmens Union of the Pacific v. Dutra Group, Dba Dutra Construction Co. Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge.
The Inlandboatmens’ Union of the Pacific (“IBU”) brought this action against the Dutra Group, alleging that Dutra violated the terms of a settlement agreement between the two parties. Dutra contends that because the IBU failed to seek arbitration of this dispute as required by the collective bargaining agreement between the parties, the federal courts lack jurisdiction over the case. The district court granted Dutra’s motion to dismiss, and the IBU appeals.
I. BACKGROUND
Dutra is a marine construction, towing, and dredging company based in Northern California.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Jerry L. Branch, Valenna Branch, Colby Branch v. Dale L. Tunnell, Individually and as Special Agent of Bureau of Land Management, State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Michael JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Juan Albino v. Lee BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Wyatt v. TerhuneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Lukovsky v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Jada Toys, Inc. v. Mattel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Payne Ex Rel. D.P. v. Peninsula School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.