Legal Opinion
Mossman v. City of Oakdale
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 14, 2009No. F054983PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WISEMAN, Acting P. J.
In this twist arising from a contractual arbitration proceeding, we address whether an arbitrator’s award that concludes (1) the City of Oakdale violated its own personnel rules, and (2) then directing the employee to be “made whole,” without more, is an enforceable award. As sometimes happens, the arbitrator ordered the parties to work out the details of the make-whole remedy, which they did not do. This appeal flows from a judgment denying a motion to vacate the arbitration award pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1286.2 on the ground the arbitrator did…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Cable Connection, Inc. v. DirecTV, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2008
- Ericksen, Arbuthnot, McCarthy, Kearney & Walsh, Inc. v. 100 Oak StreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Hanford Atomic Metal Trades Council, Afl-Cio, and C. L. Williams v. General Electric Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Portico Management Group, LLC v. HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Comerica Bank v. HowsamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Avedikian v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. CA5California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Lonky v. PatelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020