Legal Opinion
Ferreri v. Mainardi
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 2, 1988No. Civ. A. 88-3954PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KATZ, District Judge.
Defendant Philadelphia Stock Exchange (the “Exchange”) has moved to dismiss the pro se complaint of plaintiff Alfred Ferreri. 1 In his complaint Mr. Ferreri raises various claims against the Exchange, as well as against other parties, including numerous securities law violations, and claims under the common law for misrepresentation, fraud and breach of contract. 2 The Exchange argues that, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Mr. Ferreri’s complaint against them should be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Landy v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Landry v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Spicer v. Chicago Board of Options Exchange, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Spicer v. Chicago Board Of Options ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992