Stenz v. Industrial Commission
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Justice BALES,
opinion of the Court:
¶ 1 Although Arizona’s Workers’ Compensation Act does not mandate the payment of interest on benefits not timely paid, this Court has held that the general interest statute, A.R.S. § 44-1201, applies to workers’ compensation awards. Today we hold that death benefits under A.R.S. § 23-1046 are liquidated, and interest on them accrues from the time a carrier receives notice that a survivor has filed a claim with the Industrial Commission pursuant to A.R.S. § 23-1061(A).
I
¶ 2 In 2005, Charles Stenz suffered an on-the-job injury for which he filed a claim…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Pressley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Desert Mountain Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- La Paz County v. Yuma CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- DKI Corp./Sylvan Pools v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.