Legal Opinion

Stenz v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 2015No. CV-14-0298-PRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice BALES,

opinion of the Court:

¶ 1 Although Arizona’s Workers’ Compensation Act does not mandate the payment of interest on benefits not timely paid, this Court has held that the general interest statute, A.R.S. § 44-1201, applies to workers’ compensation awards. Today we hold that death benefits under A.R.S. § 23-1046 are liquidated, and interest on them accrues from the time a carrier receives notice that a survivor has filed a claim with the Industrial Commission pursuant to A.R.S. § 23-1061(A).

I

¶ 2 In 2005, Charles Stenz suffered an on-the-job injury for which he filed a claim…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Desert Mountain Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  4. La Paz County v. Yuma CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  5. DKI Corp./Sylvan Pools v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API