Legal Opinion
McIntyre v. Wick
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 31, 1996No. NonePublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Chief Justice.
ACTION
[¶ 1] Plaintiffs John McIntyre (No. 19898) and Douglas Kazmerzak (No. 19899) filed separate petitions for writs of certiorari seeking our review of the recounts in their respective state legislative elections. We issued a writ of certiorari in each case limited to review of the recount proceedings pursuant to SDCL ch 12-21. Defendants Hal G. Wick (No. 19898) and Arthur F. Fryslie (No. 19899) have asked us to dismiss each action and quash each writ, asserting that the South Dakota House of Representatives has the exclusive jurisdiction to judge the election returns…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Rome v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Roudebush v. HartkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Caldwell v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Poppen v. WalkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Steinberg v. South Dakota Department of Military & Veterans AffairsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Welsh v. Centerville TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Gray v. GienappSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Becker v. PfeiferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Feehan v. MarconeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.