Legal Opinion
Driscoll v. Townsend
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided June 18, 1999No. 1:97-cv-00120PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
HECKMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
The parties have consented to have the undersigned conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and entry of judgment, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In response to defendants’ motion, plaintiff filed a cross-motion for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, defendants’ motion is granted, and plaintiffs motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
The following facts are undisputed. On the morning of March 9,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Piper v. City of ElmiraDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2014
- Rupert v. City of Rochester, Department of Environmental ServicesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2010
- Brusso v. ImbeaultDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2010
- Jennejahn v. Village of AvonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2008
- Ads Plus Advertising, Inc. v. AultDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.