Legal Opinion

State v. Matsen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 15, 1979No. 77-09-13613, CA 10520; 77-09-13612, CA 10429PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.

Defendants in this consolidated appeal seek reversal of their convictions for criminal activity in drugs and assign as error the denial of their joint motions to suppress evidence gained in the search of their residence.

After numerous contacts with informants and nearly two weeks of surveillance, the police entered defendants’ house, frisked the occupants, detained them while a search warrant was obtained, and then searched the house and found the drugs.

Defendants argue that the police should have obtained a search warrant prior to entering the residence. We consider whether the warrantless…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. State v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  4. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  5. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. MatsenOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. EacretCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. State v. MontigueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  4. State v. ReinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. State v. TolomeiOregon Supreme Court · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API