Legal Opinion
State v. Allen
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided April 9, 1973PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LANGTRY, J,
Defendants appeal from conviction of criminal activity in drugs. ORS 167.207. They claim error in the denial of . a motion to suppress evidence produced by a .warrantless search and seizure at the time of their ¿rrest on July 8,-1972..• The essential, facts in evidence are: An investigation had been carried on by police for several weeks concerning four men who, a reliable informant had said,-had been dealing in heroin at Washington Park. They were reported to have moved from one motel to another. At the Jamaica Motel where the arrests were made two- each Of them occupied Rooms 43…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Trupiano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- In re SkolnickSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. EacretCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- State v. TaggartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State v. BaslerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- State v. HickmannCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- State v. MatsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.