State v. Murphy
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.
The defendant was tried to a jury on the charge of murder of his wife. He was convicted of murder in the second degree. On appeal he contends that fingernail scrapings taken from him against his will were wrongfully received in evidence. The state produced testimony that analysis of the scrapings revealed skin, blood cells, and white cotton fiber. This evidence was obviously introduced as tending to prove that the defendant had acquired- these substances under his fingernails by strangling his wife while she was in bed. .
At the time the police took .the fingernail scrapings they had not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. SimonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- State v. ChinnOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Cupp v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. NewtonOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. FloranceOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- State v. HeintzOregon Supreme Court · 1979
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.