Legal Opinion

United States v. Katherine G. D. Bourbon Formige, Beatrice M. Scott-Hansen, (Intervenor-Defendant)

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided September 17, 1981No. 80-1060PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion PER CURIAM.

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from the denial by the District Court of appellant’s motion to intervene in the present ease. Appellant sought, by means of intervention, to overturn a default judgment for unpaid taxes entered against her mother. The District Court held that only a taxpayer may challenge the validity of a tax assessment, and denied appellant’s motion accordingly. We affirm.

I

This case arises out of the complicated tax affairs of Katherine Bourbon-Formige, appellant’s mother and the taxpayer in the present case. During the taxable years in question Mrs. Formige was a dual…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rena Falik v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  2. Quinn v. HookDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Moyer v. MathasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  4. Graham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  5. Cooper Agency, Inc. v. McLeodDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. WoodDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1987
  2. United States v. CamejoDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1987
  3. Dominion Trust Co. of Tennessee v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1991
  4. United States v. BrooksDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API