United States v. Camejo
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JAMES LAWRENCE KING, Chief Judge.
THIS CAUSE arises before the Court upon the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Proc. 56. One Defendant, Intercontinental Bank, has filed an opposing memorandum, the remaining Defendants did not respond to the Motion. The United States [hereafter referred to as the Government] moves for judgment in its favor determining that the tax liens at issue in this cause have priority over the interests of Defendants Rolando Sosa, Juan A. Sosa, Apolinia Sosa, and the Intercontinental Bank,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ernest Leon Clemons v. Dougherty County, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Glass City Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Quinn v. HookDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
- Moyer v. MathasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Gordon C. Borchardt, Charles Oran MensikCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Shades Ridge Holding Company, Inc. v. United States of America, United States of America v. Sam A. Fiorella and Shades Ridge Holding Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Shades Ridge Holding Company, Inc. v. United States of America, United States of America v. Sam A. Fiorella and Shades Ridge Holding Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989