Legal Opinion
United States v. Brooks
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided April 28, 1995No. CV-94-483-STPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
STEWART, Magistrate Judge:
INTRODUCTION
This action was brought by plaintiff the United States of America (“United States”) against defendants James Patrick Brooks and Paul H. Casey, co-personal representatives (“PRs”) of the Estate of Henry J. Casey (“Estate”). The United States seeks to collect over $4 million in taxes which it claims was erroneously refunded to the Estate in May 1992. The sole residuary beneficiary of the Estate, a Washington nonprofit corporation called the Casey Family Program (“CFP”), has now filed a Motion to Intervene (docket # 17). CFP moves to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Trbovich v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Robert Blake v. Sant Pallan v. Willie R. Barnes, Commissioner of Corporations of the State of California, Plaintiff-In-Intervention/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Sierra Club v. Us Environmental Protection Agency, and City of Phoenix, Intervention-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Sagebrush Rebellion, Inc. v. WattCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. Newrez LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023