United States v. Goffer
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RICHARD J. SULLIVAN, District Judge:
Before the Court is Defendant Craig Drimal’s motion to suppress wiretap evidence obtained by the government during its investigation of Drimal’s involvement in an alleged conspiracy to commit securities fraud. Drimal argues that the monitoring agents violated the federal wiretap statute by failing to properly minimize privileged calls between Drimal and his wife and that, therefore, suppression of the entire wiretap is warranted. For the reasons that follow, Drimal’s motion to suppress is denied.
I. Background
A. Facts
The government first…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Arthur TortorelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- United States v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Donald E. JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Elvin Lee BynumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Drimal v. TaiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- United States v. ZemlyanskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Drimal v. MakolCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Galleon Management, LPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011