Legal Opinion
Drimal v. Tai
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 15, 2015No. Nos. 13-2963-cv; 13-2965-cvPublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN M. WALKER, JR., Circuit Judge:
Arlene Villamia Drimal brought this action against sixteen FBI agents alleging that they violated Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2522 (“Title III”), when they listened to her private calls with her husband. The calls were intercepted during an authorized wiretap on the telephone of Drimal’s husband as part of an investigation into a conspiracy to commit securities fraud. Defendant FBI agents moved to dismiss the suit for failure to state a claim and on qualified immunity grounds. The District Court for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Dolan v. ConnollyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Goe v. ZuckerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
- Liberian Community Association v. LamontCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
- Michael Matzell v. Anthony J. AnnucciCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
- NRP Holdings LLC v. City of BuffaloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.