Legal Opinion
White Motor Corp. v. Teresinski
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 11, 1989No. B033153PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DEVICH, J.
Victor Teresinski, individually and doing business as Vic’s Auto Sales (collectively Vic’s), appeals from the summary judgment entered in favor of White Motor Corporation (White) on its cross-complaint for equitable indemnity. White appeals from the trial court’s order denying its request for attorney’s fees. We reverse the judgment and dismiss White’s appeal as moot.
Background
The underlying facts giving rise to this action are as follows: On October 9, 1980, Ronna Miller rode as a passenger in a friend’s Ford Mustang automobile. The friend, who had been drinking alcohol,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Sandoval v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Scroggs v. Coast Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Sosinsky v. GrantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Tennison v. California Victim Compensation & Government Claims BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Jones v. BatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Old Republic Ins. Co. v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Sutton v. Golden Gate BridgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.